Arms and Armor—Common Misconceptions and Frequently Asked Questions
The Army Combat Uniform is the current combat uniform worn by the United States Army, U.S. Air Force, and United States Space Force. First unveiled in June , it is the successor to the Battle Dress Uniform and Desert Camouflage Uniform worn from the s and s through to the mids, respectively. It is also the successor to the Airman Battle Uniform for the U.S. Air medattr.com: Combat uniform. They may wear local garb, pose as cops, business people, whatever gets the job done. One thing they would not do is wear skintight spandex with ninja gear that screams to everyone, "I'm special!" ETA: Consider that a significant amount of GPF gear today started out as SOF gear at one point of time. From armor, to weapons accessories, attachments.
It only takes a minute to sign up. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
Watching modern Hollywood movies, one would think covert ops agents especially women all wear some sort of skintight latex or leather uniform when they're on some mission to sneak around. I highly doubt that is actually what an agent would wear when sneaking into some top secret facility, it seems more practical for showing off the actor's curves than, you know, being practical.
I might be wrong, or I may not be. Regardless, I'm curious: What would be the best kind of outfit to wear if you're sneaking into someplace? This is a truism in any military organization, especially SOF. So what do SOF Soldiers wear? I ask you in return: In what situation? Because if I am an enemy sniper, and I'm out there scanning your troop formations, I'm not gonna waste my ammunition, hide site, and opportunity to kill regular Privates or Lieutenant.
If your guys walk around in camouflage and body armor, and all of a sudden there's this group of guys walking around wearing skin-tight spandex and ninja gear, well, that fits the 'hmm, they look special' category.
Believe you me, you would not be able to operate effectively if every time you leave the wire the enemy single you out as a target. Does the ROE state that you need to be clearly identified as a national legal combatant? Then you will be wearing combat gear with your flag. Then you may wear civilian clothes or sterile uniforms. Although, the wearing of enemy uniform means you are giving up your Geneva convention protection. They may wear local garb, pose as cops, business people, whatever gets the job done.
One thing they would not what do soldiers wear today is wear skintight spandex with ninja gear that screams to everyone, "I'm special! From armor, to weapons accessories, attachments. The answer totally depends on the situation into which you are putting your spies. As the others mentioned odds are they should be dressing to blend in with their surroundings, so in those cases whatever the locals are into.
If on the other hand you are setting up a series of what do soldiers wear today with laser grids and all that, skin tight is exactly what you want. There is something to be said for a skin-tight outfit in hand to hand what do soldiers wear today as well and it is the same reason professional military commanders started requiring hair cuts way back to antiquity. It gives the enemy one less thing to grab onto when grappling or using melee weapons.
The short answer: It depends on the situation, but skin tight outfits that don't impair mobility are not what do soldiers wear today ludicrous as they may initially seem. For covert operations, the soldier or operator would need to blend into the local surroundings, but that does what do soldiers wear today mean the clothing would be what other people wear in the situation, just that it externally looks like other people's clothing.
Take a mission in the executive suite of an office building. The operator will be wearing a suit and tie, and possibly carrying a briefcase. The briefcase will be rigged to carry a weapon like a submachine gun possibly even to the point that you could aim and fire it from inside the briefcase.
The suit will only look like it has buttons, but really be held together by velcro or something similar so the operator can rapidly open the jacket and access a sidearm or special tools and equipment. The inside of the suit jacket will have lots of concealed pockets to store small items that the operator might need lock picks, gloves, thin sheets of explosive material and so on.
Obviously you don't want someone to grab your what do soldiers wear today, so the tie what bird lays white eggs a clip on; anyone who grabs it will be in for a surprise. The belt buckle might double as a knife and so on. If you are expecting to be in a melee the suit or outerwear could be made of Kevlar or a similar protective material to reduce the effect of knives or batons a Kevlar jacket or raincoat will not stop a bullet or grenade fragment; for that you would need a close fitting actual frag vest and plates.
One convention of modern western civilization will certainly help operators; the fact that small backpacks are pretty common wear among virtually all people outside the executive class, and especially in "casual wear". An how to play the oc theme on piano will be able to unobtrusively carry much more equipment with a backpack without standing out much. Finally, since many jobs actually require protective equipment and also allow access to lots of placesit might make sense to go into an area disguised as a utility worker or something similar.
The bulky clothes will conceal the protective armour vest and sidearms, the hard hat will be a true ballistic helmet and the "earmuffs" are not sound deadeners but actual radio headphones.
No one will think twice as the utility truck pulls to a stop and 4 guys get out walking towards the tool bins strapped to the side of the truck Those people dont exist. Also, its pretty much impossible to bypass good security such as cameras, alarms, guards, and masses of people.
One mistake and you are caught. The best way to infiltrate a guarded facility is to send in someone who is supposed what do soldiers wear today be there. What role does dna play in transcription one is going to question why Johnny Terrorist is in the terrorist camp.
He belongs there. The trick is making Johnny Terrorist an "asset. If Johnny Terrorist gets caught and killed, well Another method the CIA uses to infiltrate facilities is to be invited in. Did you just order a bunch of computer equipment for your terrorist activities?
Well the CIA will be happy to step in and deliver it and set it up. This is more common than you think. Edit: I want to add, the best way to not be caught, is to not be there. When gathering intel from things like computers, doing things remotely is the best bet. Back in the first Gulf War, Iraq bough a bunch of printers.
The CIA assumed these devices were going to government locations and modified the printers to send out signals, revealing their location. The CIA is known to modify hardware and software. And they are known to hack networks as well Soldiers wear uniforms for a variety of reasons. One of them is to identify them how big is an apartment size stove lawful combattnts under the laws of war.
This requires how to e file it return online insignia which can be identified at a distance, but not actually uniformity. Militaries require their own soldiers to wear distinctive rank insignia and unit patches. Elite forces often get some latitude to wear non-uniform uniforms, both to help form their esprit de corps and in recognition that they don't need "mickey mouse bullshit" to remind them they're soldiers. Militaries may also require soldiers to use only standard issue gear, or they allow some privately owned gear.
Allowing any personal gear sets a precedent -- the first soldier wants his own boots, the second brings her own sleeping bag, the third soldier has a mobile phone which tries to link up with the local grid. Only standard issue doesn't mean all equipment looks the same. One might be a radio operator with a specialized backpack, another a grenadier with a specialized vest, etc. I've been talking about soldiers on legitimate military operations. As Burki mentioned in his comment, covert ops are something else.
In a deniable operation, they wouldn't wear anything resembling their national uniform and equipment. The latter seem to be an actual attempt to blend in at a distance. And if there is some action involved like you say then comfortable clothing is needed not like the uncomfortable ones we see in Hollywood films sometimes.
Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. What kind of attire would covert ops actually wear? Ask Question. Asked 5 years, 7 months ago.
Active 2 years, 11 months ago. Viewed 4k times. Improve this question. Are we talking Delta Force raiding a site? A spy sneaking a peek at something? A jewel thief breaking into a 20th what to have with chili dogs office? Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Improve this answer. WarPorcus WarPorcus 2, 1 1 gold badge 10 10 silver badges 17 17 bronze badges.
James James 32k 14 14 gold badges silver badges bronze badges. Thucydides Thucydides It does okay against a baton, but there are still better choices.
Lastly, if there is little chance of being seen, then the clothing is not a factor. Keltari Keltari 3, 9 9 silver badges 20 20 bronze badges. Camouflage Uniforms? I'd say something like what do soldiers wear today, like what do soldiers wear today wear in real how to make good hot chocolate with cocoa powder. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google.
Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password.
Army Green Service Uniform
Aug 09, · In today's army you will probably have a room which you may have to share with another,not like the old days when you slept in a barracks with 30 . The uniforms of the United States Army distinguish soldiers from other service members.U.S. Army uniform designs have historically been influenced by British and French military traditions, as well as contemporary U.S. civilian fashion trends. The two primary uniforms of the modern U.S. Army are the Army Combat Uniform, used in operational environments, and the Army Green Service Uniform worn. Yes, not just US soldiers. I have recently noticed that often, here on Quora, people are always asking, “Why do US soldiers do this, why do US soldiers do that, why do US soldiers wear (insert certain equipment here) in combat”, etc. Why are peopl.
A military uniform is a standardised dress worn by members of the armed forces and paramilitaries of various nations. Military dress and styles have gone through significant changes over the centuries, from colourful and elaborate, ornamented clothing until the 19th century, to utilitarian camouflage uniforms for field and battle purposes from World War I on.
Military uniforms in the form of standardised and distinctive dress, intended for identification and display, are typically a sign of organised military forces equipped by a central authority. Sometimes added to the casual wear category is physical training uniforms. A distinction should be made between uniforms and ethnic dress. If a particular people or culture favoured a distinctive dress style this could easily create the impression of uniformly dressed warriors.
The issue is further complicated by the distinctive features weapons, armour, fighting style and native dress of particularly effective warrior classes often being copied. Thus the distinctive and colourful clothing of the Hungarian hussars became a model for hussar units all over Europe.
The kilts and sporrans of Scottish highland clans were distilled into regimental dress when the British Army started to recruit from these tribal groups.
Mercenary or irregular fighters could also develop their own fashions, which set them apart from civilians, but were not really uniforms. The clothing of the German Landsknechte of the 16th century is an example of distinctive military fashion. Special units such as Zouaves developed non-standard uniforms to distinguish them from troops of the line.
There are a few recorded attempts at uniform dress in antiquity, going beyond the similarity to be expected of ethnic or tribal dress. One example is the Spanish infantry of Hannibal who wore white tunics with crimson edgings. Another is the Spartan hoplite in his red garment. The legions of the Roman Republic and Empire had a fairly standardised dress and armour, particularly from approximately the early to mid 1st century onward, when Lorica Segmentata segmented armour was introduced.
Even the armour produced in state factories varied according to the province of origin. Fragments of surviving clothing and wall paintings indicate that the basic tunic of the Roman soldier was of un-dyed off-white or red-dyed wool.
While some auxiliary cohorts in the late Roman period had carried shields with distinctive colours or designs, there is no evidence that any one Roman legion was distinguished from another by features other than the numbers on the leather covers protecting their shields.
The feudal system of Western Europe provided instances of distinguishing features denoting allegiance to one or another lord. These however seldom went beyond colours and patterns painted on shields or embroidered on surcoats. Orders of military monks such as the Knights Templar or Hospitaler wore mantles respectively of white with red crosses on the shoulder or black with white crosses over the usual pattern of armour for their periods.
In the later part of the Medieval period instances of standardised clothing being issued for particular campaigns began to occur. English examples included the white coats worn by Norfolk levies recruited in and the green and white clothing that identified Cheshire archers during the 14th century.
The regular thematic provincial and Tagmata central troops of the Byzantine Empire East Roman are the first known soldiers to have had what would now be considered regimental or unit identification. During the 10th century, each of the cavalry "banda" making up these forces is recorded as having plumes and other distinctions in a distinctive colour.
Officers wore a waist sash or pekotarion , which may have been of different colours according to rank. The styles and decoration of military uniforms varied immensely with the status, image, and resources of the military throughout the ages. Uniform dress became the norm with the adoption of regimental systems, initially by the French army in the midth century.
Before a few German and Dutch regiments had worn red or yellow coats. From about onwards some Swedish infantry had been issued with standard coloured dress under Gustavus Adolphus hence his "yellow" or "blue" regiments. Even Royal guards would sometimes only be issued with distinctive coloured or embroidered surcoats to wear over ordinary clothing. To help armies distinguish friend from foe, scarves, pieces of foliage, or other makeshift identification known as "field signs" would be worn,  a practice still recognised under international humanitarian law and the laws of war as a "distinctive sign".
By this time, in France at least, the general character of the clothes and accoutrements to be worn on various occasions was strictly regulated by orders. But uniformity of clothing was not to be expected so long as the "enlistment" system prevailed and soldiers were taken in and dismissed at the beginning and end of every campaign. The beginnings of uniform are therefore to be found in truly national armies, in the Indelta of Gustavus Adolphus, and the English armies of the English Civil War.
In the earlier years of the latter, though the richer colonels uniformed their men for instance, the Marquess of Newcastle's "Whitecoats" and King Charles's own red-coated Lifeguard of foot , the rustics and the citizens turned out for war in their ordinary rough clothes, donning armour and sword-belt. But in the Long Parliament raised an army for permanent service, and the colonels became officials rather than proprietors.
The New Model Army was clothed in the civilian costume of the date—ample coat, waistcoat, breeches, stockings and shoes in the case of cavalry, boots —but with the distinctive colour throughout the army of red and with regimental facings of various colours and breeches of grey. Soon afterwards the helmet was replaced by a grey broad-brimmed hat. From the coat was eventually evolved the tunic of the midth century, and the hat became the cocked hat of a later generation, which generally disappeared during the decade of — to reappear in the late 19th and early 20th century, by which time it had its original form of a "slouch-hat.
The cavalry Iron Sides , however, wore buff leather coats and armour long after the infantry had abandoned them. Thus the principle ever since followed—uniform coat and variegated facings—was established.
By choice or convenience the majority of the corps out of which the New Model Army was formed had come to be dressed in red, with facings according to the colonel's taste. In Austria sixty years afterwards events took the same course. The colonels there uniformed their men as they saw fit, but had, probably to obtain "wholesale" prices, agreed upon a serviceable colour, pearl grey. When in Prince Eugene procured the issue of uniform regulations, few line regiments had to be re-clothed.
In France, as in England and Austria, the cavalry, still led by the wealthy classes rather than officered by the professional, was not uniformed upon an army system until after the infantry. But in six-sevenths of the French cavalry was uniformed in light grey with red facings; and about half the dragoon regiments had red uniforms and blue facings. The Marquis of Louvois , in creating a standing army, had introduced an infantry uniform as a necessary consequence.
The native French regiments had light grey coats, the Swiss red, the German black and the Italian blue, with various facings. The French grey was probably decided upon, like the Austrian grey, as being a good "service" colour, which could be cheaply manufactured.
During the 18th century the normal military uniform in Europe comprised a standardised form of civilian dress tricorn hat , long-skirted coat, waistcoat and breeches. Dress was surprisingly standardised between European armies in cut and general outline. The distinction normally lay in colours: red coats for the British and Danes, light grey then white for the French, Spanish, and Austrian  infantry, dark blue for the Prussians and Portuguese, green for the Russians, etc.
The Royal Comtois Infantry Regiment of the French Army, for example, had large dark blue cuffs on its off-white coats. To a certain extent the functions required of a given group of soldiers were reflected in their dress. Thus artillery uniforms in most armies were usually of dark blue, for the practical reason that handling black powder would have soiled lighter coloured clothing.
Officers who paid for their own clothing were slower to accept uniforms. During the late 17th century they were often dressed in individual styles and colours according to their own taste and means. In part this was because the uniform dress issued to the rank and file was considered a form of livery—the mark of a servant and demeaning to members of the social class from which officers came.
One early practice in the French and other armies was for officers to wear coats of the facing colour of their regiments. Rank insignia as such was unknown until well into the 18th century.
The gorget hanging from a chain around the neck a last survival of medieval armour was the only universally recognised mark of an officer until epaulettes developed from clusters of ribbons formerly worn on the shoulder. Even when officers' uniforms became the subject of detailed regulation they remained easily distinguishable from those of other ranks, by the better quality and richness of the materials and trimmings used. Gold or silver braiding on the hats and coats of officers usually matched the bronze or pewter of the numerous buttons on regimental clothing.
It should, however, be remembered that a soldier had to march, parade, fight and sometimes sleep in the same garment and that such extras as greatcoats or working clothes were seldom issued until the end of the century.
The highly organised armies of the Ottoman Empire employed distinctive features of dress to distinguish one corps or class of soldier from another. An example would be the conical black hats of felt worn by the Deli cavalry of the early 19th century. However the basic costume was usually that of the tribal group or social class from which a particular class of warrior was drawn.
As such it was sufficiently varied not to rank as "uniform" in the later sense. An elaborate system of colourful standards largely provided unit identification. Even the appearance of the Janissaries was likely to reflect individual means and taste, although red was a favoured colour and the white felt zarcola headdresses were similar. It was not until the reorganisation of the Ottoman Army by Sultan Mahmud II during the s that completely standardised dress was issued. The first fifteen years of the 19th century influenced the appearance of military uniforms until the s.
Sometimes the Napoleonic Wars are identified as being the acme of colourful and ornate uniforms, but actually the several decades of relative peace that followed were a time of even more decorative styles and embellishments.
The Napoleonic soldier on campaign was likely to present a shabby and nondescript appearance as unsuitable peacetime dress quickly deteriorated or was replaced with whatever local substitutes were available. Until later on in the century dyes were primitive and different batches of uniforms worn by the same unit might present differing shades, especially after exposure to rain and sun.
The white uniforms popular amongst many armies through the 18th and early 19th centuries soiled easily and had to be pipeclayed to retain any semblance of cleanliness. British soldiers were known for their striking red clothing hence the name " Redcoats ". This was actually a fairly dull shade of madder red until the general adoption of scarlet for tunics in the s. The American industrial revolution began in the Blackstone Valley , of Massachusetts and Rhode Island , with early textiles, from This may reflect the considerable difference in roles and conditions of service between sailors and soldiers.
Until the middle of the 19th century only officers and warrant officers in the Royal Navy wore regulated uniforms. Through the 18th century to the Napoleonic Wars navy officers had a form of dress broadly resembling that of army officers, though in dark blue with white facings.
In the early 19th century Royal Navy officers developed a more distinctive form of uniform comprising in full dress uniform a cocked hat, dark blue coatee with white collar and cuffs, dark blue or white trousers, or breeches. In a simplified form this dress without the cocked hat survives as the modern ceremonial dress for flag officers. Throughout this period sailors supplied or made their own clothing. Sailors developed traditional clothing suitable for their work: loose-fitting trousers with belts made of rope; tunics that slipped over the head, with arms to above the wrist so that the cloth would not foul in ropes passing through a cleat or pulley.
For cold weather, a jumper was knitted from yarn or wool. For wet weather, old sail cloth was made into a coat with hat or attached hood that was waterproofed with tallow or fat. In these days, the officers would designate certain afternoons to " make and mend " clothing. A sailor with little clothing to make or mend used this time as "time off". In January the decision was taken to issue complete uniforms to petty officers and seamen.
The flared " bell bottom " trousers disappeared after the Second World War. While certain distinctive features emerged - such as the red pompom worn on the crown of the French sailor's cap, the open fronted jacket of the German Navy or the white round cap of the U.
Navy - the overall pattern remained standard until the development of specialist working or protective rigs during the Second World War.
It is generally supposed that Union soldiers wore blue uniforms and Confederate soldiers wore grey ones. However, this was only a generalisation.
<- How to get images from database in asp.net - What number is march in months->